Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior: the
effects of feedback on the component operants of stimulus equivalence

Olive Healy and Dermot Barnes-Holmes
Glasheen Girls National School and National University of Ireland, Ireland

Four experiments examined the effects of differential consequences on derived relational responding. Subjects were trained and tested for the formation of two combinatorially entailed relations. This was followed by training and testing for a transfer of function using the same stimuli. Training and testing constituted one session. During each session, subjects learned a novel set of interrelated conditional discriminations (i.e., using
novel stimuli). In Experiment 1, both Conditions 1 and 2 involved explicit feedback on test performances. In Condition 1, feedback was accurate following both tests for combinatorial entailment and transfer of function until subjects responding reached a predefined stability criterion. The feedback then switched to inaccurate following the test for transfer of function and remained accurate following the test for combinatorial entailment until responding once again reached a predefined criterion. Condition 2 was similar to Condition 1, except that once the stability criterion was reached feedback switched to inaccurate following the test for combinatorial entailment and remained accurate following the test for transfer of function. The results showed that once relational responding emerged and stabilised, switching in responding readily occurred in
accordance with the feedback delivered. Experiment 2 was identical to Experiment 1, except that an ABA design was employed using differential consequences. Experiment 3 was similar to Experiment 2, except that it involved ABCA and ACBA designs. Experiment 4 used differential consequences to fracture congruent patterns of responding on tests for mutual entailment, combinatorial entailment and transfer of function.

Keywords: derived relational responding, feedback, fracture



 Back to program

 Retour au programme

 Back to contributors

 Retour aux contributeurs

 Back to summary

 Retour au sommaire